Canned fish is popular because it is quick and easy to use in everyday life. Many people especially choose tuna, as it is familiar and simple to add to meals.
At the same time, canned products are often cheaper than fresh fish and have a long shelf life. This makes them a practical choice in many households.
Not all are the same
Although canned fish may look similar, their contents differ. According to Planeta, some types of fish may be a better choice than others.
Larger fish such as tuna can contain more mercury because they accumulate it through the food chain. Smaller fish typically contain less of this substance.
Also read: Lifestyle diseases can increase cancer risk by up to 30 percent
In addition, the amount of healthy fatty acids varies. Some fish have a higher content of omega-3, which is important for the body.
A better option
When comparing options, Planeta points to one type of fish as a stronger choice. Canned mackerel contains more omega-3 fatty acids and less mercury than tuna.
This means it can support both heart and brain health if eaten regularly. At the same time, it remains inexpensive and easy to store.
Mackerel therefore stands out as a healthier alternative among canned fish.
Also read: How to spot fresh eggs instantly at the supermarket
Sources: Planeta.