The idea that breakfast is the most important meal of the day did not come from a doctor's clinic. It first appeared in a 1917 article by American dietitian Lenna F. Cooper in Good Health, a magazine edited by John Harvey Kellogg, the physician whose sanitarium co-invented flaked cereal. Cooper wrote that breakfast is important because it "gets the day started," and the line was later adopted as advertising copy for cereals like Grape-Nuts and Post Toasties.
More than a hundred years on, controlled trials tell a different story. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials, published in The BMJ in January 2019, found no evidence that eating breakfast helps adults lose weight. Instead, people assigned to eat breakfast consumed on average about 260 more calories per day than those who skipped it, and skippers lost roughly 0.44 kilograms more over the study periods.
Where the rule actually came from
Good Health, where Cooper's article appeared, was edited by Kellogg himself and billed itself as the oldest health magazine in the world. Decades later, public relations pioneer Edward Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud, took medical advice out of context and spun it as doctors' endorsements of bacon and eggs, cementing the hearty American breakfast as a morning ritual.
None of that history is evidence. It is marketing that hardened into common sense.
Also read: Plant protein vs. animal protein: which is better for your heart and muscles?
What the trials actually show
The BMJ review's authors cautioned that all the included studies carried a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain, and that follow-up was short, averaging seven weeks for weight and two weeks for energy intake. Outside experts largely agreed the effect sizes were small and the data thin.
"The findings of this study which suggest that people who skip breakfast consume 260 few calories a day are not credible," said Prof. Tom Sanders, emeritus professor of nutrition and dietetics at King's College London, in comments collected by the Science Media Centre. Prof. James Betts of the University of Bath added that "the very concepts of breakfast consumption versus skipping are not well-defined" across the trials.
The practical read is narrower than the slogan. For adults who are not hungry when they wake up, forcing a bowl of cereal is unlikely to move the scale in either direction.
Where the evidence for breakfast is stronger
Children and adolescents are a different case. A review published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience concluded that habitual breakfast consumption and school breakfast programs are positively associated with academic performance, with the clearest signal in mathematics and arithmetic among undernourished students. On-task classroom behavior also tends to improve when breakfast is available.
Also read: How eating turmeric every day may affect your joints, heart and brain
Morning athletes and people with type 2 diabetes who exercise before noon also have practical reasons to eat early, since fueling before activity supports performance and helps stabilize blood sugar. If skipping breakfast leaves you ravenous by mid-morning and reaching for whatever is nearest, that is another honest reason to eat something.
For most adults, though, the evidence points to a simple rule that has nothing to do with the clock. Eat when you are genuinely hungry, and pay more attention to what is on the plate than to when it lands there. If breakfast helps you eat better across the day, keep it. If it does not, meal timing itself is a smaller lever than food quality.
Also read: Cognitive decline is not inevitable: your brain may keep improving at any age
This article is made and published by Jesper Bengtson, who may have used AI in the preparation.