Most of us have heard that a glass of red wine with dinner is somehow friendlier to the heart than a stiff drink after work.
The thinking goes it is the alcohol itself that matters, not what you pour. The reality looks more layered.
A UK Biobank study of 340,924 midlife adults, published this year in Nutrition Journal, found that beer, cider and spirits were linked to higher death rates at every level of intake. Low wine intake went the other way and lined up with lower risk, mainly for heart disease.
Participants were followed for an average of 13.4 years, during which 22,381 of them died. Heavy drinkers were about 24 percent more likely to die from any cause than people who rarely or never drank.
Also read: One extra year in school could change your dementia risk
Their cancer death risk was roughly a third higher, and heart deaths were up 14 percent.
Where the wine protection showed up
The gap between the three drinks was clearest at low intakes. Moderate wine drinkers had about a 21 percent lower risk of dying from heart disease than people who seldom drank.
The same low intake of beer, cider or spirits came with roughly 9 percent higher cardiovascular death risk.
The wine signal was not open-ended, though. At higher wine intake, cancer deaths started climbing too. The protective pattern only turned up at low intake and only for certain outcomes, not across the board.
Also read: Scientists find that one extra daily serving of fruit is linked to a 13% lower depression risk
Why the type of drink seems to matter
The researchers suspect the answer is less about the wine itself and more about how people drink it. Wine often turns up at the dinner table alongside food, while beer and spirits are more often drunk between meals or on an empty stomach.
Faster alcohol absorption on an empty stomach is thought to be harder on the body.
Zhangling Chen, a cardiovascular researcher at the Second Xiangya Hospital in China, led the work.
Chen told the American College of Cardiology that lifestyle differences between wine drinkers and other drinkers are likely part of the story too.
Also read: Your Alzheimer's blood test could be wrong: Here's what scientists found
Wine drinkers in large cohorts tend to eat better and move more, and the statistics can only partly adjust for that.
"The health risks of alcohol depend not only on the amount of alcohol consumed, but also on the type of beverage," Chen said.
Why this does not make wine a health drink
The study is observational. It can show patterns but it cannot prove that beer or spirits cause earlier death, or that wine protects anyone.
Alcohol intake was also self-reported and measured mostly at the start of the study, with little data on how drinking changed over the next 13 years.
Also read: These common vegetables contain surprisingly high amounts of potassium
More important for anyone eyeing the wine result is that cancer death risk rose with higher alcohol intake no matter what people drank.
Earlier work has already connected just two drinks a day to a higher risk of alcohol-related death, and the new numbers point in the same direction. In people with chronic illnesses or heart disease, Chen said, the risks could be higher still.
Also read: Taking blood pressure pills? This common mistake could cost you the benefits
This article is made and published by Ida-Marie Palm Varbæk, who may have used AI in the preparation.